Section 512. Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge.

(1) No finding, sentence or order by a Court of competent jurisdiction shall be
deemed invalid merely on the ground that no charge was framed or on the ground of any
error, omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder of charges, unless, in
the opinion of the Court of appeal, confirmation or revision, a failure of justice has in fact
been occasioned thereby.
(2) If the Court of appeal, confirmation or revision, is of opinion that a failure of justice
has in fact been occasioned, it may,—
(a) in the case of an omission to frame a charge, order that a charge be framed,
and that the trial be recommended from the point immediately after the framing of the
charge;
(b) in the case of an error, omission or irregularity in the charge, direct a new trial
to be had upon a charge framed in whatever manner it thinks fit:
Provided that if the Court is of opinion that the facts of the case are such that no valid
charge could be preferred against the accused in respect of the facts proved, it shall quash
the conviction.